Judgement 44850/18

Applicant name KIRPICHEV (KIRPICHENKO) AND OTHERS
Applicant type Natural person
Number of applicants 28
Country Russia
Application no.44850/18, 52954/18, 56135/18, 25403/19
28534/21, 28773/21, 29826/21, 30438/21
31692/21, 32169/21, 32719/21, 32752/21
33306/21, 33456/21, 33806/21, 34091/21
35049/21, 35139/21, 35140/21, 35144/21
35147/21, 35165/21, 35166/21, 35188/21
35688/21, 35818/21, 35843/21, 36391/21
Date 09/11/2023
Judges Peeter Roosma, President,
 Ioannis Ktistakis,
 Andreas Zünd
Institution Court
Type Judgment
Outcome Art. 8 violation
Reason Not necessary democratic society
Type of privacy Informational privacy
Keywords Facial recognition
Facts of the case Main judgement about Article 11 ECHR, one applicant invokes Article 8 ECHR: Art. 8 (2) – restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies – use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and his subsequent conviction
Analysis Mini-judgement
Other Article violation? Yes many
Damage awarded 9800 for the applicant that invoked Artilce 8 ECHR
Documents Judgment