| Applicant name | VINOKUROV AND OTHERS |
| Applicant type | Natural person |
| Number of applicants | 51 |
| Country | Russia |
| Application no. | 32706/15, 58888/15, 21083/17, 48523/17 55895/17, 56720/17, 81580/17, 2139/18 3505/18, 4093/18, 10931/18, 14770/18 16763/18, 18857/18, 23305/18, 28335/18 33211/18, 36319/18, 36470/18, 38492/18 38743/18, 42425/18, 43180/18, 46800/18 47215/18, 47726/18, 47798/18, 49394/18 49851/18, 51117/18, 52935/18, 52992/18 54123/18, 54652/18, 55858/18, 56397/18 56418/18, 56743/18, 56838/18, 56896/18 58617/18, 58695/18, 59060/18, 1231/19 2189/19, 2862/19, 3266/19, 4648/19 4908/19, 5129/19 |
| Date | 02/11/2023 |
| Judges | Lorraine Schembri Orland, President, Frédéric Krenc, Davor Derenčinović |
| Institution | Court |
| Type | Judgment |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Violation |
| Reason | No legal basis |
| Type of privacy | Informational privacy |
| Keywords | Surveillance |
| Facts of the case | Main judgement about Article 3 and 13 ECHR, one applicant invokes Art. 8 (1) – secret surveillance – complaint about the operation experiment of 28/08/2017, GU MVD of Russia for the city of Moscow involving covert audio and video recording – no judicial authorisation of the covert surveillance; |
| Analysis | Mini-judgement |
| Other Article violation? | Yes, many |
| Damage awarded | One applicant invoking Article 8 ECHR received 9750 |
| Documents | Judgment |