| Applicant name | X. and Y. |
| Applicant type | Natural person |
| Country | The Netherlands |
| Decision no. | 6202/73 |
| Date | 16/03/1975 |
| Judges | –
|
| Institution | Commission |
| Type | Decision |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
| Reason | Interference remedied |
| Type of privacy | Private and family life; home |
| Keywords | Prohibition inhabit home |
| Facts of the case | Applicants had been refused permission to live in their home. |
| Analysis | The Commission stresses that the local court had already reversed the prohibition and applicants were now free to live in their dwelling. It could be argued that, at least for a period in time, the applicants had been deprived of their rights under the Convention, but the Commission finds otherway. It also stresses that in no way, Articles 14 and 18 + Article 8 have been violated. |
| Documents | Decision |