| Applicant name |
K.
|
| Applicant type |
Natural person
|
| Country |
Italy and Germany
|
| Decision no. |
5078/71
|
| Date |
14/12/1972
|
| Judges |
–
|
| Institution |
Commission (Plenary)
|
| Type |
Decision (Partial)
|
| Outcome Art. 8 |
Inadmissible
|
| Reason |
Exhaustion Domestic Remedies
|
| Type of privacy |
Family privacy; reputation
|
| Keywords |
Even if; indirect vertical privacy; broadcast
|
| Facts of the case |
Applicant is charged on grounds of fraud and usury. A television program has broadcasted about the matter, which the applicant feals interfers with his family life and right to a fair trail.
|
| Analysis |
The Commission stresses that even if the applicant could demonstrate that the state has responsibility for the broadcast he, in any case, did not exhaust all domestic remedies so that the case is declared inadmissible.
|
| Documents |
Decision
|