| Applicant name | X. |
| Applicant type | Natural person (prisoner) |
| Country | Germany |
| Decision no. | 4300/69 |
| Date | 14/12/1970 |
| Judges | –
|
| Institution | Commission (Plenary) |
| Type | Decision |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
| Reason | Ratione materiae |
| Type of privacy | Private life |
| Keywords | Prisoner |
| Facts of the case | The applicant first complains of his conviction and sentence, that he was not heard orally by the Court and was not given the opportunity to comment on the expert opinion and of the length of his detention on remand. |
| Analysis | The Commission does not treat this matter uner Article 8 ECHR, even although it was invoked by the applicant, apparently feeling that these are matters that fall outside the scope of the right to privacy. |
| Documents | Decision |