Applicant name X.
Applicant type Natural person (prisoner)
Country Germany
Decision no. 4300/69
Date 14/12/1970
Institution Commission (Plenary)
Type Decision
Outcome Art. 8 Inadmissible
Reason Ratione materiae
Type of privacy Private life
Keywords Prisoner
Facts of the case The applicant first complains of his conviction and sentence, that he was not heard orally by the Court and was not given the opportunity to comment on the expert opinion and of the length of his detention on remand.
Analysis The Commission does not treat this matter uner Article 8 ECHR, even although it was invoked by the applicant, apparently feeling that these are matters that fall outside the scope of the right to privacy.
Documents Decision