| Applicant name | S. G. O. |
| Applicant type | Natural Person (prisoner) |
| Country | Denmark |
| Decision no. | 3019/67 |
| Date | 06/02/1968 |
| Judges | S0RENSEN SUSTERHENN PETREN Ermacora CASTBERG SPERDUTI Fawcett TRIANTAFYLLIDES WELTER BALTA DE GAAY Fortman D0N0GHUE DELAHAYE LINDAL BUSUTTIL |
| Institution | Commission (Plenary) |
| Type | Decision (Partial) |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
| Reason | Manifestly ill-founded |
| Type of privacy | Bodily and psychological privacy; informational privacy |
| Keywords | Mental institution; bodily and psychological interference; control of correspondence |
| Facts of the case | Man sent to mental institution. He complains about various interferences with his bodily and psychological integrity and of control of his correspondence. |
| Analysis | The Commission does not find that the case raises any violation of the right to privacy. It does not say that, for instance, the interferences were provided for by law and necessary in a democratic society in light of the protection of the protection of health and morals, but simply disregards the complaints. |
| Documents | Decision |