| Applicant name | H C K |
| Applicant type | Natural Person |
| Country | Norway |
| Decision no. | 2550/65 |
| Date | 06/02/1968 |
| Judges | EustATHIADES Petren CASTBERG Welter BALTA DELAHAYE LINDAL BUSUTTIL |
| Institution | Commission |
| Type | Decision |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
| Reason | Ratione Materiae; Ratione Personae; Exhaustion Domestic Remedies; Manifestly Ill-Founded |
| Type of privacy | Informational Privacy; Locational Privacy; Family Privacy; Economic Privacy |
| Keywords | Unfair treatment; even if |
| Facts of the case | Man complains to have been treated unfairly by the government, on a number of grounds, such as that he was falsely charged with having violated the law, that such was made public and ruined his business, that no compensation was granted, etc. |
| Analysis | The Commission does not take this complain seriously. It stresses that certain of these complaints appear to be inadmissible for various reasons such as incompatibility ratione personae, ratione materiae and the non-exhaustion of domestic remedies and adds that in any case, an ex officio examination of the complaints show no violation of the Convention whatsoever. |
| Documents | Decision |