| Applicant name |
X.
|
| Applicant type |
Natural Person (prisoner)
|
| Country |
Austria
|
| Decision no. |
2370/64
|
| Date |
11/02/1967
|
| Judges |
–
|
| Institution |
Commission (Plenary)
|
| Type |
Decision
|
| Outcome Art. 8 |
Inadmissible
|
| Reason |
Horizontal claim; exhaustion of domestic remedies
|
| Type of privacy |
Private Life
|
| Keywords |
Prisoner; horizontal claim
|
| Facts of the case |
Prisoner complains about a variety of Convention violations.
|
| Analysis |
It is unsure what would be the violation of Article 8 ECHR in this matter. In any case, the Commission rejects most claims because the domestic remedies have not been exhausted and another claim was rejected because it concerned the behaviour of his lawyers.
|
| Documents |
Decision
|