| Applicant name | X. |
| Applicant type | Natural Person |
| Country | Netherlands |
| Decision no. | 2290/64 |
| Date | 06/02/1967 |
| Judges | –
|
| Institution | Commission (Plenary) |
| Type | Decision |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Manifestly ill-founded |
| Reason | Ratione materiae |
| Type of privacy | Economic Privacy |
| Keywords | Private life; professional activity |
| Facts of the case | A farmer complains that a Farmer Association makes decisions and sets out policies which affect his private life, while he has little influence of the Association’s decision making. |
| Analysis | The Commission does not see any violation of Article 8 ECHR. |
| Documents | Decision |